Tagsadvertisement
architecture
art
assignment
Barack Obama
Comics
design
fashion
graphic design
Hillary Clinton
Humor
In-class Exercise
information design
Iraq
Maps
news
Pedagogy
pedagogy examples
photography
photography
photography
Political Propaganda
politics
Propaganda
science
visual art
Visual Rhetoric
war
Writing Exercise
youtube
NavigationDisclaimerThese blog entries represent the views of their authors, not necessarily those of the CWRL, the University of Texas at Austin, or any of its affiliated entities. |
ReplyYour contribution to the blog: Please Read Before PostingThe viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately. Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted. |
Recent comments
|
I wanted to post on this last week, but have been out of town! I'm so glad you put this up.
This issue this shirt raises for me, in addition to those that Melanie listed, has to do with the "authenticity" that the shirt bestows on the wearer. Will people assume that those wearing these t-shirts have been raped? Does the medium of the t-shirt negate its supposed confessional quality? But if the shirt loses its status as a personal revelation, does that negate the kind of work the shirt was originally designed to do?
This shirt reminds me of the Texas Association Against Sexual Assault (TAASA) sexual assault awareness campaign, called "Speak Up. Speak Out." The TAASA website includes a description of the campaign:
In this campaign, notice the emphasis on hearing from actual survivors--ostensibly to combat the same kind of silence that Baumgardner wants to shatter.
In the same Jezebel post that Melanie references, the author quotes from a friend of Baumgardner's, Christen Clifford, who says, "There really are so few spaces where it's considered appropriate to talk about [rape]," referencing a dinner party where rape came up and conversation just halted. The author then writes, "Call me old fashioned, but I'm not sure rape is something anyone is ever going to feel comfortable discussing at a dinner party." While that may be the case, I'm disappointed that the author doesn't take her own point further. Instead, to me, Baumgardner's shirt moves rape into a begins to blur the lines between spotlighting the victim (as in the TAASA campaign) and making the fact of rape less easy to dismiss or compartmentalize.